Skip to main content

Indian Politics is quite like "Bigg Boss"

With elections on our head every time, it becomes difficult to avoid them. I know I shouldn't care about other state elections, but it's all over news. Besides, it's fun! So I watched one of these discussions on YouTube which tried to decipher what Indian politics is. They are all useless but fun, really. But then it hit me. Indian politics is just like the popular reality TV show, Bigg Boss.


Up until a few years ago, I followed Bigg Boss quite religiously. To an extent that I had to ban myself from watching any more. Yes, I peeled myself off from the TV a few years ago when I realized it took too much and gave back absolutely nothing in return. Even after that, I accidentally(Hehe!) viewed a few episodes of Bigg Boss and got involved in some of the issues of the contestants, which really were non-issues. I got sucked right in. I could come out of that madness only when I began consuming even crazier acrobatics: The Circus Of Indian Politics.

And literally this new find happened like it did for Bigg Boss. I remember a few years ago when Smriti Irani (another TV connection) used to be the minster of telecommunication, someone (probably a Congress MLA) filed a case of misuse of MPLAD funds on her. MPLAD funds are five crore rupees every MP receives every year for developmental works in his/her constituency and Smriti Irani reportedly apparently allegedly directed the money somewhere she shouldn't have.(News English is stupid, I know!) Long story short, the court gave strict orders (like always) to her ministry to submit  the details where the money went in like 2 weeks. I, naive as I was, fell for the lure and started following the story. Two weeks later I checked all the news and I found the court, though still strict, had given the ministry an extension. And after a few more weeks the court, stricter still, was reprimanding Irani's office still more but the report wasn't filed. By this time I had involved myself with a few more political stories which seemed interesting in the beginning but I am sure none got to closures. Every story was a new distraction from previous ones and the web went on getting complicated for the centralized Indian media to follow. I was made to believe, like everyone, that the closure in these stories is only possible through next elections.

The absence of any closure in these political stories is what makes me think of their similarities with Bigg Boss. You are looking for closure as a viewer but you don't get them. And even if they exist, they do not receive any screen time. The only closures are the populist polls which I always felt were stupid ways to settle the debate. He got eliminated, he must have been wrong. You think she was wrong, but she won.

This is my attempt to find as many parallels between the two circuses.


Well, voters are still voters, or viewers comprising of indifferent by-standers to keen observers to bloggers and news portals who try to milk the "Politics of the Shows", making a business out of closures. This got meta!


Next is the host Salman Khan who also tries to pass off as the ineffective judge which is eerily similar to law of our country that insufficiently gives out verdicts on our disputes. The judges are all products of the society they judge.





Contestants obviously are our Circus acrobats who up their game after every poll. They keep the circus running by generating those closure-less stories that are complete cow-dung. Their job is to keep the narrative alive while the real work is done behind the walls and dark glasses.


Another important part of the Show are the cameras or the media in the political Circus. In fact, they are the selling point. The illusion of "the public life" is created through these lenses. They are the eyes that look for the juicy stories and ignore the closures.

Next is the Bigg Boss itself. I find it difficult to guess the analogy here so your suggestions are welcome. Nonetheless, Bigg Boss seems an abstract entity. Maybe a symbol, or an emotion. It is a derivative of another show, Big Brother, which itself came from a book on totalitarian communist governments. A book on politics gave birth to Big Brother and Bigg Boss, and now the shows reflect politics. In all cases, the Big -dash- has been abstract and never shown in flesh and blood. So, it could be analogous to our conscience which is endlessly judgemental, objectifying, populist and always wanting that moral high ground. Quite close to Bigg Boss.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Kesari Movie Review: Immense Nationalism, No Soul

Nationalism in film is nothing new to be appreciated or criticized. But what is lacking in discourse is the analysis of this film nationalism. Why haven't anyone as of yet attempted to trace a pattern to this sort of Indian film making? Are we afraid? Or are we really this “nationalistic”? Well we do cry when are soldiers die? That must mean something. Shouldn't it? Kesari is the newest addition in our long list of tear jerking patriotic cinema. And I don't write this sarcastically. Kesari is patriotic. And a few other things as well. Although the plot and dialogues try everything they have to prove that 36 Sikh regiment of the British Indian army did not fight on British orders to protect British forts but to prove their valour and worth and the great sacrificing spirit of the community, the songs talk of teri mitti mein mil jaavan and the sacrifice of the soldier. Pretty much what nationalism is about in its entirety. Interestingly, the songs reflect the ...

The Genius of Andhadhun: The Climax Explained

Andhadhun poster Halfway through watching Andhadhun on Netflix, I realized the characters have all got somewhat ironic arcs. One pretending to be blind actually becomes blind, someone who stole human organs asked to donate their organs, lady Macbeth reference, and many more that I missed. These ironic arcs make you a little skeptical about the plot of the film. It begins to feel like the story is a little too good to be true. With a number of lucky coincidences, heavenly influences and sudden changes of heart, Andhadhun feels more and more Bollywood . But then the movie does not drag for even a second; which, keeps you hooked. Considering that the same director, Sriram Raghavan, had earlier given us another gem called Badlapur , where all characters keep looking for closures and lead miserable lives, I decided the makers want me to be skeptical. After all, real lives are more like Badlapur and not like Andhadhun. And as the movie ends, Raghavan's intentions become clear. ...

Is Uri: The Surgical Strike a propaganda film?

Uri: The Surgical Strike theatrical poster Well, the answer is yes. Just not in the way you think. It saves you a lot of time and you can leave right away if you cannot read beyond the headlines. Also, if you were looking for some confirmation bias and don't have patience to listen to the other side. And honestly, both  for  and  against  groups on this topic have gone deaf to other side. But let's not blame anyone here. It is the standard these days. In the world of today, arguments are not meant to explain your point with reason but to please those who already agree with you. Confirmation bias blooms on all fences. Opinions become content and there exists an audience for whatever side you pick. So what side do I pick? Well, no points for guessing; none.  Uri: the Surgical Strike  is propaganda but not in the way it portrays the events but the way it depicts the army. If I still have your attention, we could be friends. Uri: the Surgical Strike...