Skip to main content

Why No One Reads The Constitution

Recently, I read Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, the fifth book in the series, and incidentally found out that the Constitution of India is less than half of the length of the fantasy novel.

This piqued my curiosity and I wondered why more people do not read the Indian Constitution; why is it such a feared document and left only for the evil group of people who academically study law.

Of course Indian people were never fond of reading and the times of literary dominance in Indian culture dates back to days when not much was really written and all literary works were composed orally and passed through spoken words. But even the tiny reading community of India shies away from the document defining and describing the rights of the citizens. I tried to look into the reasons why it is not a readable book for Indians.

The Indian Constitution is accepted to be the longest constitution in the world. That might seem a daunting fact but the document is nowhere a tome, standing at just 117,369 words. For a little context, take a look at the word counts of various Harry Potter books.

Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone: 76,944 words.
Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets: 85,141 words.
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban: 107,253 words.
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire: 190,637 words.
Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix: 257,045 words.
Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince: 168,923 words.
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: 198,227 words.

I compare Harry Potter books simply for the reason that these books were written for a younger audience and were wildly successful despite their size. So clearly, the length of the constitution is not the reason for Indian readers not grabbing it.

If we look at the reading patterns of the Indian readers, we find that most readers are not really into reading contemporary literature. Most Indians read just one or two books in their entire life and those few are mainly religious texts.

Interestingly, the writing style in the constitution is exactly like religious texts with 448 different articles grouped in 22 different parts. In comparison, Bhagavad Gita has 700 slokas divided in 18 chapters, and the Baalkand of Ramcharitmanas, which is the first episode the book, has 361 chaupai. These two are the most read books of Hinduism in north India. The Holy Qur’an, meanwhile, has over 6000 verses written in 77,449 words.

So reading the constitution religiously, one can finish the book in less than a month or two. But the constitution is not as popular among the masses as Bhagavad Gita or Holy Qur’an simply because there is absolutely no benefit of reading it. The religious texts, at least, ‘promises’ a moral benefit to the followers and the language does improve through reading it. The constitution doesn’t make any such promises and on top of that you are guaranteed to lose all your communication skills you acquired throughout your life if you choose to speak or write in the language as in the constitution.

If you think you might become a knowledgeable bloke or you would understand your rights better, you are mistaken. Reading the constitution can not do any of that. The maximum it will do is win you some online arguments with strangers.

The little that I read of the constitution (specifically, article 19), told me that Indian citizens are free folks with various rights defined and described in detail, but all the rights are subject to some reasonable restrictions. But these reasonable restrictions are never explained. They are left for the people in power at the time and place of conflict to decide. And if our leaders are to be believed, anything can incite violence; anything might endanger the unity and integrity of the country; and absolutely everything poses a threat to the national security.

So even though you are free to think, express, belief, have faith and worship by your choice, your political parents still have the right to correct you and knowledge of the constitution counts for nothing. Go to the courts, and fight. If that is not quick enough, which it isn’t, vote for a new parent.

#india #loksabhaelections #constitutionofindia

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Kesari Movie Review: Immense Nationalism, No Soul

Nationalism in film is nothing new to be appreciated or criticized. But what is lacking in discourse is the analysis of this film nationalism. Why haven't anyone as of yet attempted to trace a pattern to this sort of Indian film making? Are we afraid? Or are we really this “nationalistic”? Well we do cry when are soldiers die? That must mean something. Shouldn't it? Kesari is the newest addition in our long list of tear jerking patriotic cinema. And I don't write this sarcastically. Kesari is patriotic. And a few other things as well. Although the plot and dialogues try everything they have to prove that 36 Sikh regiment of the British Indian army did not fight on British orders to protect British forts but to prove their valour and worth and the great sacrificing spirit of the community, the songs talk of teri mitti mein mil jaavan and the sacrifice of the soldier. Pretty much what nationalism is about in its entirety. Interestingly, the songs reflect the ...

Is It Really Feminism To Outrage On What Hardik Pandya Said On Koffee With Karan?

Hardik Pandya and K L Rahul on Koffee with Karan Ever since Hardik Pandya appeared on  K offee  with  Karan , the opinion outlets have overflowed with opinions on feminism and social patenting. The cricketer's unrestrained confessions of his own life have tingled the debate on morality for celebrities. Why talk about it? While most outraged social warriors find Pandya's comments sexist, they don't have much issue with what he does in his private life. In fact, they appreciate the "all-rounder" for having safe sex. Their isn't even a problem with him having multiple sexual partners as long as it is consensual. The hidden sneaky sexism lies in  talking  about it. This is bizarre. Weren't we fighting for movies like  Lipstick Under My Burka  just last year which  showcased women owning and expressing their sexuality? Can we not see the social parenting that prohibited women from expressing themselves is at work here? Or is it because w...

Taimur Ali Khan's Job Application

December,2038 Waow sir/ma'am My heartiest congratulations for the recent façade of a success of your recent Masala action scenes compilation. The success party even made to those paid prime time news. That’s really something. Obviously we live in the most progressive era where there are absolutely no issues to talk about. That reminds me though, the love story shoved in the film was a new touch. I think it was revolutionary. I watched the film with my mother and she threw up just before the interval. The movie was great! I write this in regard to that much publicized elite advertisement which shows only in star kids' newspapers. TL;DR I could be your hero. *smirk* As you must have noticed, I have already began appearing in my parents' press conferences for better limited exposure. Yes I am the Taimur Ali Khan. I am the royal blood and the only one of my name, the prince to the imaginary throne and salvation for entertainment journalists. The constant camera flashe...